The author discusses the challenges posed by software complexity in relation to free-software licenses, arguing that high complexity inhibits users' ability to modify software, even when they have the legal right to do so. By limiting the complexity of the Dillo browser, the author aims to ensure that it remains accessible for modification and encourages interoperability with other programs. He suggests that a modified license could help maintain software simplicity and hackability.

The Free Software Foundation (FSF) has launched the LibrePhone initiative, aiming to create the first entirely free software smartphone by eliminating proprietary components. However, the challenge lies in the lack of vendor documentation and the dependence on closed-source firmware, which has historically hindered similar projects. Despite these obstacles, the FSF is committed to pursuing this long-term goal of software freedom in mobile devices.

The talk explores the notion that while open source software has become mainstream and widely adopted, free software has not yet achieved the same level of success due to persistent reliance on closed software in critical areas. It emphasizes the importance of user control and freedom in software usage, while highlighting the challenges posed by proprietary technologies in everyday devices and their impact on sustainability and user rights. The speaker critiques the optimism surrounding open source victories, revealing the ongoing struggles for true software freedom.