The author argues that the Trump administration’s approach to the Iran agreement is shapeless and arbitrary, resembling a bad business deal more than coherent foreign policy. He criticizes the Memorandum of Understanding for giving Iran control of key assets and failing to address nuclear weapons, then notes Trump’s pattern of grand promises followed by abrupt walkaways.

• The Memorandum of Understanding punts on nuclear weapons, gives Iran control of the Strait of Hormuz, and unlocks roughly $300 billion in reconstruction funds.
• Trump's team swung from threatening total war and regime change to treating Iran's government as a reasonable negotiating partner almost overnight.
• Israel's leaders were blindsided as the deal undercut their interests in Lebanon.
• The pattern mirrors Trump's real-estate deals: grand threats and promises followed by an abrupt walkaway, leaving partners with a broken deal and no leverage.

President Trump provided an update on the Iran war, claiming progress and projecting another two to three weeks of military involvement. He reiterated threats to escalate attacks if negotiations fail and emphasized the need for allies to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Polls show that many Americans doubt his strategy and clarity on the conflict's end.

• Trump says the Iran conflict is "nearing completion," projecting 2-3 more weeks of involvement without a clear exit strategy or long-term goals.
• He threatens to escalate strikes on Iran's power plants if negotiations fail, while also calling Iran's new leadership "less radical" and "more reasonable."
• 67% of Americans in a CNN poll say Trump lacks a clear plan for handling the situation.
• Trump frames the war's 32-day duration by comparing it to past American wars, even as families of fallen service members push back on his rhetoric.