The article discusses the implications and costs associated with implementing mandatory code reviews in software development. It explores the potential benefits of improved code quality and collaboration against the backdrop of increased time and resource expenditures. The author argues for a balanced approach that weighs both the pros and cons of such practices.

Code reviews are essential for improving code quality and team collaboration. Key aspects to consider during code reviews include clarity of code, adherence to coding standards, testing coverage, and the overall impact on the project's architecture. Effective communication and constructive feedback are also crucial to make the process beneficial for all team members.