The essay explores the evolving role of design within the context of shifting economic and political landscapes, particularly emphasizing the transition from liberal capitalism to neo-mercantile capitalism. It critiques the U.S. government's design initiatives, highlighting the potential dangers of aesthetics normalizing harm while advocating for a trioptic design approach that integrates social, political, and aesthetic dimensions to foster accountability and inclusivity in governance.

Concerns are raised about Donald Trump's proposed establishment of a national design studio, which could lead to the prioritization of his personal aesthetic over professional design standards. Critics argue that this initiative could undermine the integrity of public design and architecture, as well as the role of experienced designers in shaping national projects. The implications for design policy and the broader cultural landscape are significant, warranting a careful examination of the potential consequences.