The article investigates the effects of inlining all functions in LLVM, a key optimization technique in compilers. It discusses the potential drawbacks, such as code duplication and increased compile times, while conducting experiments to assess runtime performance when ignoring these constraints. Ultimately, it highlights the complexities involved in modifying LLVM's inlining behavior and shares insights from experimental results.

The article discusses the trade-offs between space and time in stack walking mechanisms for C++ exception handling and stack unwinding on Linux platforms. It compares various methods such as frame pointers, DWARF .eh_frame, and the newer SFrame format, detailing their performance impacts and size overhead when compiling LLVM executables. The analysis reveals that the choice of stack walking method significantly influences runtime performance and memory usage.