Observability in applications comes with instrumentation overhead, which can impact performance and resource consumption. A benchmark of OpenTelemetry in a Go application revealed a CPU usage increase of about 35% and some additional memory usage, while still maintaining stable throughput. For teams prioritizing incident resolution, the tradeoff for detailed observability is often justified, though eBPF-based instrumentation offers a lighter alternative for monitoring without significant resource costs.

Observability in applications introduces instrumentation overhead that can impact performance, particularly when using OpenTelemetry with Go. A benchmark comparing a Go HTTP server's performance with and without OpenTelemetry revealed a notable increase in CPU and memory usage, but maintained stable throughput. The choice of observability method should balance the need for detailed tracing against resource costs, with eBPF-based instrumentation offering a more lightweight alternative for high-load environments.