Code reviews are essential for maintaining high-quality software and fostering a collaborative team environment. They help identify issues early, improve code quality, and enhance knowledge sharing among team members. A structured approach to code reviews can significantly benefit both individual developers and the overall project.

The article discusses the implications and costs associated with implementing mandatory code reviews in software development. It explores the potential benefits of improved code quality and collaboration against the backdrop of increased time and resource expenditures. The author argues for a balanced approach that weighs both the pros and cons of such practices.

A collection of tactics for developing and maintaining design systems is presented, emphasizing collaboration, consistency, and quality assurance. The strategies include defining core principles, fostering teamwork between design and development, and ensuring documentation is clear and accessible. The guide also addresses managing contributions, exploring design variations, and aligning multi-brand systems for a cohesive user experience.