Lily Ray breaks down why current SEO hacks—like self-promotional listicles, prompt-injection widgets, and scaled comparison pages—are short-lived and likely to trigger a Google crackdown. She argues E-E-A-T is a nuanced, long-term framework, not a checklist, and warns that original data and genuine expertise remain the only durable advantage.

• Google is signaling a crackdown on spammy AI-search tactics—link schemes, prompt-injection widgets, self-promotional listicles—often previewed through subtle changes to its Search Quality Rater Guidelines before core updates hit.
• Prompt-injection widgets that trick AI summarizers into repeating hidden brand pitches are classified by Google as "LLM poisoning" and treated as outright spam.
• LLMs.txt files don't currently affect rankings despite hype; Google frames them as prep for future agentic search, so they're worth minutes of effort but not a growth strategy.
• E-E-A-T isn't a scoring checklist but a fuzzy, multi-signal framework—transparent author bios, expert voices, and site history build the kind of genuine trust that outlasts algorithm shifts, unlike scaled comparison pages or paid "best of" placements.

Kevin Indig, who advises Airbnb, Shopify, Reddit, and G2, hosts a 60-minute live session to reveal what actually works in SEO and AI search. He’ll cover whether SEO is still worth it, how startups can beat incumbents in AI search, top moves for small teams, and if AEO services or ChatGPT can deliver results. The session is on July 1; everyone who registers gets the recording.

• Kevin Indig (advisor to Airbnb, Shopify, Reddit, G2) is hosting a live 60-minute session on July 1, 2026 breaking down what works in SEO vs. AI search (AEO)
• The session promises hard data on whether SEO still delivers ROI and whether startups can beat incumbents in AI search rankings
• It will address which small-team tactics work fastest and whether paid AEO services or ChatGPT can substitute for real expertise
• Registrants get the recording regardless of live attendance