6 links
tagged with all of: accessibility + figma
Click any tag below to further narrow down your results
Links
Figma Sites, currently in beta, are criticized for generating overly complex and semantically flawed code, leading to multiple accessibility issues. The article highlights specific problems, such as non-standard navigation structures, redundant elements, and a lack of proper interactive components, questioning the effectiveness of the tool in producing usable web content.
Figma Sites, a new tool allowing designers to create websites directly from Figma, is criticized for producing poor-quality, poorly structured code that lacks semantic meaning and accessibility. The author argues that while the tool promises ease of use, it ultimately falls short of delivering production-ready websites, suggesting that designers should demand better and be critical of such tools.
Yo is an AI-powered feedback tool designed for Figma that streamlines the design process by providing instant insights through simulated personas, automated audits, and user interviews. With a credit-based system, users receive 1000 free credits to start, making it accessible for teams to create user-centered designs efficiently. The tool emphasizes quick validation and actionable feedback to enhance usability and accessibility.
The article challenges the myth that accessibility limits color palette choices, specifically focusing on yellow and purple combinations. It provides six WCAG-compliant color palettes alongside a detailed tutorial and video to help designers create accessible palettes using tools like Figma. The author emphasizes that knowledge and creativity can expand color options rather than restrict them.
The article discusses Figma's introduction of an AI-powered app builder that enables users to create websites with ease. This tool aims to simplify the design process and expand accessibility for those without coding skills, allowing for more interactive and customizable web experiences.
Figma Sites, a new web publishing tool, prioritizes speed and aesthetics over accessibility, leaving users to navigate critical features related to web content inclusivity on their own. Despite its potential, the tool lacks essential accessibility considerations, such as semantic HTML and adequate tagging, which undermines its usability for all users. The author expresses disappointment that Figma's focus on rapid production neglects the ethical responsibility of creating accessible web experiences.