Andrew Carnegie set a precedent in 1901 that wealthy people have apparently never forgotten: move massive trees to your property to signal serious money. The steel magnate uprooted roughly 30 trees—each towering over 60 feet—from New York and Connecticut forests and transplanted them to his own grounds. The Times covered this as noteworthy because it was genuinely extreme. You don't just decide one day to relocate a forest. You hire crews, you spend enormous sums, you make it happen because you can. Over a century later, the same impulse persists, though the specifics have shifted. Today's wealthy don't necessarily raid public forests, but they obsess over mature trees on their properties the way previous generations obsessed over art collections or yachts. A fully grown oak or maple becomes a status symbol—proof that you own land old enough to have trees that took decades to reach their current height. You can't fake it by planting saplings. Everyone knows the difference between a 15-year-old tree and a 150-year-old one. The appeal makes a weird kind of sense. Real estate agents know that established trees boost property values and create an air of permanence. But for the ultra-wealthy, it goes deeper than practical value. A massive tree says you've owned something long enough for nature itself to validate your claim to it. It's the opposite of the new money cliché—instead of flaunting what you just bought, you're flaunting what's been yours so long it's practically grown into the ground.