What I Learned From Nearly 1,000 Interviews at Amazon

Open the original

Short summary

The author shares key lessons from conducting nearly 1,000 interviews at Amazon, emphasizing that technical skills alone aren't enough to secure a job. Candidates often fail due to poor self-presentation and lack of preparation for behavioral questions. Investing time in storytelling and delivery can significantly improve interview outcomes.

  • Candidates spend ~95% of prep time on technical skills, but behavioral rounds are what actually sink most rejections.
  • Just 10 hours of dedicated story preparation can meaningfully change interview outcomes.
  • Unpracticed delivery causes rambling; treating interview answers like a work presentation (rehearsed and concise) fixes this.
  • Fit with the team, not raw technical ability, is the final deciding factor in hiring.

Full summary

The author, a former Amazon Bar Raiser, shares insights from nearly 1,000 interviews, emphasizing that candidates often miss the mark not due to technical skills but because of poor self-presentation. Technical readiness is the entry point, but fit with the team is what ultimately determines hiring decisions. Many candidates, despite strong technical abilities, fail to articulate their experiences clearly, leading to rejections in the behavioral rounds. Most candidates focus disproportionately on technical preparation, spending about 95% of their time on it while neglecting non-technical aspects. This imbalance is problematic because behavioral questions, which require concrete examples and clear storytelling, can’t be winged. The author suggests that investing just 10 hours in story preparation can significantly improve interview outcomes. Delivery is equally important. Many candidates don’t practice their stories, leading to rambling and confusion during interviews. This lack of preparation contrasts sharply with how they would approach a work presentation. The author encourages candidates to rehearse common interview questions and to be clear and concise in their delivery, stressing that preparation is not inauthentic—it enhances communication of their true capabilities.

Ask about this article