The article presents findings from a study comparing the citation patterns of ChatGPT and Google Search. It reveals that citations generated by ChatGPT are 2 to 3 times more likely to include tables than those from Google Search. This suggests that users of ChatGPT might find more structured data presentation, which can enhance clarity and comprehension in research and information retrieval. The study highlights how different citation formats can affect the way information is consumed and understood. Tables can provide a concise overview, making complex data more accessible. This characteristic may give ChatGPT an edge in academic and professional contexts where clarity and data organization are paramount. In contrast, Google Search tends to present information in a less structured manner, which may require more effort from users to distill key points. The implications of these findings are significant for content creators and researchers. Understanding the strengths of different tools can help them choose the right platform for their needs. If structured data presentation is a priority, ChatGPT might be preferable. This study not only sheds light on citation practices but also invites further exploration into how different AI tools can shape information dissemination.