Saving two minutes in a design process can lead to significant time savings when scaled across a large user base. A Lead UX Designer streamlined a workflow for a B2B project, impacting over 10,000 employees. By saving each of them two minutes on a task they perform 50 times daily, her redesign effectively saved 500,000 hours monthly. This highlights a common oversight among designers: they often fail to consider the scale of their work when assessing its impact. Scale is vital for prioritizing design changes. For example, a "medium priority" issue on a homepage viewed by a million users might be more critical than a "critical priority" issue affecting only 800 users on a user profile menu. Decision-makers, like project managers (PMs), prioritize based on user encounters. Tools like the RICE prioritization method help quantify the number of affected users and the potential impact of changes. However, designers can start simpler by mapping user workflows to identify where usability issues arise and how they affect user experience. In the B2B context, understanding scale becomes even more important because budgets and resources are limited. Not all usability issues can be treated equally; minor changes that affect many users may need to take precedence over more severe issues that fewer users encounter. This approach ensures that designers align their priorities with business needs, especially when resources are constrained. By focusing on the most impactful design efforts, designers can better communicate the value of their work and secure necessary buy-in from stakeholders.