Microsoft is using Claude Code internally while promoting its own Copilot product. This revelation sparked a debate among developers, with many arguing that it’s not a sign of hypocrisy but rather a savvy business move. Microsoft’s strategy is to position Azure as a comprehensive platform for all AI models, benefiting from partnerships with companies like Anthropic. Users pointed out that Copilot is a more affordable product at around $10 per month, while Claude Code, priced at about $150 per month, is geared toward enterprise-level developers. The pricing reflects the differing target audiences and capabilities of the two tools. Developers have noted that even though Claude Code doesn't always perform better on benchmarks, it consistently solves real-world problems more effectively. Many users appreciate its coding style, larger context window, and overall user experience. There’s a consensus that while competitors like OpenAI's Codex are improving, Claude Code currently stands out for those who can afford it. Conversations among users reveal frustration with how benchmarks are often misinterpreted, suggesting that practical performance is more important than raw scores. For many developers, the ability to integrate tools seamlessly into their workflow is a significant factor in their preferences.