6 min read
|
Saved February 14, 2026
|
Copied!
Do you care about this?
The article argues that true value in technology often outlasts its inflated valuations. It uses the example of humanoid robots, particularly 1X Technologies' Neo, to illustrate how flashy demos can mislead investors about a product's actual capabilities. The author stresses the importance of focusing on real value rather than hype-driven valuations.
If you do, here's more
Om Malik argues that true value outweighs mere valuation in the tech industry, a view shaped by his extensive experience and historical insights. He illustrates this with the example of 1X Technologies and its humanoid robot, Neo, which is controlled by a human operator rather than functioning autonomously. While the company has raised significant funds (around $123 million) and aims to secure a billion-dollar valuation, Malik points out that the actual capabilities of the robot fall short of the hype. The technology often looks impressive in viral videos, but the reality is that it struggles with basic tasks.
Malik highlights the disparity between perceived value and actual performance, drawing on comments from robotics expert Rodney Brooks. He notes that flashy demonstrations can mislead investors and consumers. Despite potential market demand for robotics, particularly in aging populations across Asia, the path to practical, autonomous robots remains uncertain. He believes companies in China might lead this market due to their technological advancements.
The piece critiques the current tech cycle where inflated valuations overshadow genuine value. Malik reflects on past trends like the gig economy, emphasizing that while many startups have garnered high valuations, only a few have truly delivered value, such as Uber and DoorDash. He warns against focusing solely on financial metrics, asserting that a better gauge of future success lies in the real value provided to customers.
Questions about this article
No questions yet.