6 min read
|
Saved February 14, 2026
|
Copied!
Do you care about this?
The author reflects on the ongoing war in Ukraine, emphasizing the need for support for Ukraine against Russian aggression. They discuss their background, political views, and argue against justifications for the invasion, highlighting the stark differences between the two nations' military actions.
If you do, here's more
The piece reflects on the ongoing war in Ukraine, marking the four-year anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion. The author emphasizes the need for unwavering support for Ukraine, arguing that the war represents a clear act of aggression rather than a complex conflict with blame on both sides. They discuss their personal background, born in Russia but raised in Canada, explaining that their perspective is shaped by both internal and external viewpoints. The author has observed the political landscape for years, even sending a bitcoin to Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny in 2017, but acknowledges their limited involvement.
The first section lays out the rationale behind supporting Ukraine, countering two prevalent justifications for Russia's actions: Russia's security concerns regarding NATO and claims of protecting Russian-speaking populations in Ukraine. The author critiques these arguments, asserting that past grievances cannot justify the invasion's brutality. They highlight the stark contrast in developments between Ukraine and Russia over the last decade. While Ukraine has made significant democratic reforms, Russia has regressed under increasing repression. The article cites examples of Russian military actions against civilians, including attacks on civilian infrastructure and documented war crimes, underscoring the one-sided nature of the conflict.
The author draws attention to the importance of labeling evil as such, suggesting that failing to do so leads to inaction. They argue that Ukraine's military actions primarily target military infrastructure rather than civilians, contrasting this with Russia's tactics. The piece concludes with the author's belief that one can love their country while opposing its aggressive actions, framing the support for Ukraine not merely as an act of solidarity but as a moral imperative.
Questions about this article
No questions yet.