Icons in data tables often add unnecessary complexity rather than simplifying user experience. Cody Thistleward argues that in the pursuit of minimalist design, the clarity of text has been sacrificed for cryptic symbols that increase cognitive load. He references Norman Nielsen's research, which shows that using both text and icons together improves recall and reduces errors. When data tables become cluttered with non-universal icons, users face a cognitive tax, having to decipher meanings that should be instantly recognizable. Thistleward highlights the difference between text and icons in terms of spatial frequency. Text provides a predictable pattern, making it easier for the brain to process. In contrast, icons are intricate and require more mental effort to interpret. This "visual entropy" can overwhelm users, especially in data-heavy environments. He points out that the object-like quality of icons, while beneficial in isolation, becomes a hindrance when integrated into complex systems. The conclusion emphasizes that designers should focus on how users perceive information. Choosing icons over text creates visual speed bumps that hinder data processing and understanding. Thistleward urges designers to resist the temptation to embellish interfaces with icons and instead prioritize clarity through text, which aligns with human cognitive processing.