A solid design review begins with the fundamental question of usability: does the interface effectively serve its purpose? The author emphasizes that a good design should behave like a considerate human, guiding users and respecting their time. Key aspects of a review include visual hierarchy, accessibility, and brand cohesion. Visual hierarchy must direct attention to what truly matters, while accessibility addresses the basics like contrast and tap areas, ensuring inclusivity for all users, not just those with perfect vision. Brand cohesion means the design should align with established company guidelines, avoiding disjointed elements that feel out of place. The review process should adapt based on the design stage. A raw sketch requires different questions than a prototype or a launched product. Each stage reveals unique issues, and missing a review layer can lead to oversight. Flows are particularly crucial; even aesthetically pleasing designs can confuse users if transitions don’t facilitate decision-making. The review culminates in tools like Figma, where annotations and structured feedback connect design choices to principles and research. For clients and product owners, providing context about goals, audience, and constraints is vital. The more information shared, the more targeted the team's recommendations can be. Ultimately, the aim of a design review is to uncover the elements hindering progress rather than simply critiquing the work. At the core, every effective interface is built on a series of deliberate decisions, with the rest being mere embellishments.