Francisco Nunes explores the evolving role of navigation in the context of artificial intelligence in his essay. He questions whether AI is actually eliminating navigation or merely changing its form and agent. Drawing from discussions in study groups and philosophical readings, Nunes argues that while AI tools handle navigation invisibly, this shift alters our cognitive engagement with navigation itself. He introduces the concept of "navigability" as a human practice that predates digital tools, emphasizing that understanding navigation as a learned skill is key to grasping its implications in the digital age. Nunes outlines how navigation, historically dependent on tools like maps and compasses, has evolved with technology. AI disrupts traditional navigation by removing the need for users to actively seek information. Instead, the system anticipates needs and provides information directly, which changes the nature of user agency. This delegation of navigation to AI systems can lead to cognitive debt, a term used to describe the decline in our ability to remember and engage with information due to over-reliance on AI tools. Studies, such as one from Fermat’s Library, illustrate how dependence on AI can impair memory and authorship, raising concerns about the long-term impact on cognitive skills. The essay raises critical questions about who benefits from the reduced friction in navigation. Nunes points out that companies leverage this seamless experience to optimize user engagement and increase profits, all while masking the underlying mechanisms and biases of the technology. He warns that this normalization of AI's role can lead to a loss of critical thinking and agency, a phenomenon Stiegler terms cognitive proletarianization. The transition from active navigation to passive consumption poses risks for our cognitive development and understanding of technology's influence on our lives.