A recent study assessed the creativity of over 100,000 people against several large language models, such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. The findings reveal that while some AI models can outperform an average human on basic creativity tasks, especially those measuring divergent thinking, the most creative humans still hold a significant advantage. In particular, the top 10% of human participants not only outperformed the AI but widened the gap, indicating that exceptional human creativity remains difficult for AI to replicate. The researchers used the Divergent Association Task (DAT), where participants must list ten unrelated words. This straightforward task allowed for a large-scale comparison, highlighting how AI can generate diverse word choices quickly. However, DAT only captures one aspect of creativity—divergent language production. It does not account for taste, emotional resonance, or contextual appropriateness, which are essential in creative work. While AI excels at generating volume, it struggles with selective creativity, such as identifying the best idea or shaping it for a particular audience. Further comparisons involved creative writing tasks like crafting haikus and short stories. Even in these areas, top human creators maintained their edge over AI. The research suggests that AI can serve as a tool for brainstorming and generating ideas, but the unique human ability to refine and judge those ideas remains vital. Keeping up with advancements in AI models is important, as their capabilities can change rapidly, affecting how they perform in creative tasks.