Kerri and the author recently took a ceramics class where he attempted to create a hypercube instead of a traditional mug or bowl. His instructor wasn't impressed, but he found beauty in the process and the resulting glaze, which shifted in color. This experience led him to draw parallels between coding and pottery, emphasizing that both are mediums for ideas. Just as clay responds to pressure and movement, code is never static; changes can lead to unexpected outcomes, requiring constant adjustment. The author reflects on the fragility of both mediums. Early attempts at pottery often resulted in broken pieces, a reality that doesn't elicit despair but rather a chance to start anew. He argues that attachment to code can hinder progress, suggesting that developers should feel free to delete or rewrite lines without emotional attachment. This mindset echoes the shift in pottery production during the industrial revolution, where machine-made ceramics became commonplace, and the value of handcrafted pieces increased. As AI technologies advance, the author suggests that coding might undergo a similar transformation. With large language models capable of generating code quickly, routine programming tasks may become automated. However, he believes that this will allow programmers to focus on creative and complex projects—like his hypercubes—rather than mundane boilerplate coding. The essence of programming remains intact, even as the methods of production evolve. The author expresses optimism about this shift, as it may lead to more meaningful and innovative work in software development.