The piece reflects on the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, particularly as it approaches the four-year mark since Russia's full-scale invasion. The author, who has roots in Russia but grew up in Canada, expresses strong support for Ukraine and labels the war as a crime rather than a complex situation. They argue against two main justifications for the Russian invasion: the idea that Russia has a right to guarantee its security by preventing NATO's presence and the claim that Ukrainians violated the rights of Russian speakers in Crimea and Donbas. The author contends that even if past grievances exist, they do not justify the aggression seen in 2022. The author highlights a significant shift in Ukraine over the past decade, viewing it as a country that has made substantial improvements, especially in military reforms, while noting that Russia has descended into increasing repression under Putin. They mention NATO's expansion as a response to Russian aggression, citing historical conflicts such as the wars in Chechnya and the invasion of Georgia. The piece also critiques the perception of the situation as a “dirty conflict,” pointing out that Russia's actions have caused widespread suffering and destruction throughout Ukraine, including attacks on civilian targets like hospitals and theaters. The author emphasizes the importance of accurately labeling evil and taking a stand against it. They note that while there are valid criticisms of Ukraine’s military actions, such as attacks on Russian military infrastructure, the overall context shows a clear moral distinction between the two sides. Ukrainian forces target military assets, while Russian actions have led to significant civilian casualties. This perspective challenges the narrative that both sides share equal blame and stresses the importance of solidarity with Ukraine in its defense against aggression.