The author expresses deep concern over the current state and future of AI technology, questioning whether it has reached its peak. They imagine a scenario where AI only achieves a "good enough" standard — capable of building software and simulating experiences, but falling short of true excellence. The fear is that this mediocrity will become acceptable to users, leading to a market flooded with subpar applications and systems. The notion of delivering 90% of a solution raises the question of whether users will settle for that last missing 10%. The author draws parallels between the software industry and the larger societal issue of complacency. They highlight a troubling trend where developers prioritize speed over quality, leading to a cycle of mediocre products that fail to inspire innovation. This environment is exacerbated by AI, which allows for rapid production of software but lacks the creative spark that true artisans bring. There’s a sense that user engagement and imagination are dwindling, with the risk that many may just want functional devices rather than striving for better technology. There's a stark contrast between the potential of AI tools to empower non-developers and the reality that most people may not care about the underlying tech issues. The author worries that as technology becomes increasingly commodified, the passion for craftsmanship in software development will fade away. The piece paints a grim picture of a future where not only are tech problems ignored, but also the very essence of software craftsmanship is lost to rapid production and low expectations.