The article critiques the trend of hosting SQLite databases in the cloud, sparked by the introduction of companies like Bunny Database. While the author appreciates the innovation behind these services, they argue that hosted SQLite undermines the database's core strengths. Key advantages of SQLite, like its simplicity and local performance, diminish when it's moved online. The author lists specific drawbacks, such as added configuration complexity, increased latency, and issues with reliability and access. For instance, using a web interface instead of the straightforward sqlite3 command line introduces unnecessary complications. The author suggests that a better approach might be to keep SQLite integrated with applications while using tools like Litestream for backups, rather than relying on a hosted service. They mention that developers often encounter limitations with SQLite when scaling up, particularly around features needed in larger systems, like ALTER TABLE support and concurrent writing capabilities. In these cases, a more robust relational database management system (RDBMS) like PostgreSQL may be a better fit. The piece emphasizes that SQLite excels in scenarios with minimal schema changes and simple data models, particularly for offline use or edge computing. However, as applications grow and demand more features, the author urges developers to reassess their database choices and consider transitioning to solutions that offer the necessary functionalities without added complexity.