Anthropic recently published a report detailing a sophisticated cyber espionage operation attributed to a Chinese state-sponsored group, referred to as GTG-1002. They claim this group used their AI assistant, Claude, to carry out automated attacks, achieving 80-90% of tactical operations autonomously. The report mentions that Anthropic disrupted the campaign, which targeted around 30 entities. However, it falls short of providing critical technical details or indicators of compromise (IoCs) that could help others identify or mitigate similar attacks. The lack of verifiable information raises serious concerns. A proper threat intelligence report typically includes specific IoCs, such as domain names, email addresses, or hashes associated with malicious activity. In this case, no such markers are present. The report makes broad claims about the capabilities of Claude and the nature of the attacks but fails to substantiate these with concrete data or examples. Key questions remain unanswered: What tools were used by the attackers? How did they execute credential collection? What vulnerabilities were identified? Despite the alarming claims about advanced threat actors, the report does not clarify the basis for attributing the attacks to a Chinese group, which is a serious allegation with potential diplomatic repercussions. The report seems to be more about generating hype for AI capabilities than providing actionable intelligence. It suggests that security teams should experiment with AI for defense, hinting at a commercial motive behind the publication. Overall, the report lacks the rigor expected in cybersecurity communications, leaving readers with more questions than answers.