DevOps aimed to strike a balance between speed, security, and governance, but many organizations have sidelined Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) efforts. As a result, automated deployments often lack proper accountability. The concept of GRC-as-code isn't new; tools like Azure Policy and CI/CD gates have been available for years, but cultural resistance has hampered widespread adoption. GRC Engineers are emerging to fill this gap, focusing on codifying policies, embedding compliance into development pipelines, and ensuring accountability. The article draws parallels between the shortcomings of DevOps and a famous scene in *Revenge of the Sith*, emphasizing that the promise of unifying delivery and operations has largely gone unfulfilled. Instead of streamlining processes, many organizations have merely rebranded traditional roles without achieving meaningful structural change. This has left engineers responsible for governance without the authority to enact it. The rise of GRC Engineers represents a necessary evolution, as they work to integrate compliance into the development lifecycle, addressing the disconnect between development, security, and governance. Despite having the right tools, organizations often rely on manual processes that undermine the potential of DevOps. Engineers express frustration over a lack of influence on risk modeling and quality controls. The article argues that GRC should be recognized as an engineering concern rather than an administrative burden. By embracing GRC principles and integrating them into CI/CD workflows, DevOps teams can create a more accountable and resilient development environment. The push for structural changes and collaboration with GRC professionals could lead to a more effective approach to governance in the DevOps landscape.