The author reflects on the ongoing war in Ukraine, marking the upcoming four-year anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion. They emphasize the need for strong support for Ukraine, arguing that the war is a blatant act of aggression rather than a complicated conflict with blame on both sides. The author draws from their background—born in Russia but raised in Canada—to provide a unique perspective, noting their political observations over the years and their limited involvement, such as sending a bitcoin to Alexei Navalny in 2017. In the first part of their argument, the author counters two common justifications for Russia's actions: the notion of security concerns regarding NATO and the claim that Ukrainians have mistreated Russian speakers in Crimea and Donbas. They acknowledge past mistakes by Western nations but assert that these cannot justify Russia's invasion initiated in 2022. The author observes that while Ukraine has made significant progress in governance and military reform, Russia has regressed under increasing repression and imperialism. They cite the stark contrast in military conduct, highlighting Ukraine's targeted attacks on military infrastructure versus Russia's indiscriminate assaults on civilians. The second part addresses the future, discussing the current stalemate and potential paths toward a peaceful resolution that respects the rights of the Russian populace. The author argues for the importance of recognizing and naming the evil of aggression clearly—believing that this clarity is crucial for mobilizing a collective response against it. They describe the Russian military's actions as lacking humanitarian intent, referencing specific incidents like the attack on a theater in Mariupol and numerous civilian casualties. By contrasting these actions with Ukraine's military operations, the author illustrates a moral and ethical distinction between the two sides, reinforcing their support for Ukraine's right to defend itself.