2 min read
|
Saved February 14, 2026
|
Copied!
Do you care about this?
The author discusses the divisive opinions surrounding memecoins and NFTs within the crypto community. They argue that while some memecoins can be profitable investments, they ultimately harm the industry's reputation. The piece emphasizes the distinction between low-value memecoins and successful projects like Pudgy Penguins.
If you do, here's more
The thread dives into the polarized views within the crypto community, particularly around the value of memecoins. The author identifies himself as a proprietary venture capitalist who isnβt sidelined from the market. He clarifies that his firm holds profitable memecoins like $MOTHER and $WIF, but he still sees them as detrimental to the overall space. His stance is that while they may be profitable, they lack the substance needed for long-term growth.
He challenges the common misconception that all NFTs and memecoins are synonymous. The author acknowledges that many profile picture (PFP) NFT collections resemble memecoins, but he makes an exception for Pudgy Penguins. He highlights how @LucaNetz has built a brand that provides real value and fosters community engagement, a contrast to the speculative nature of most memecoins. He expresses openness to changing his mind if a memecoin achieves similar success, but he hasn't seen any evidence of that happening so far.
Questions about this article
No questions yet.