3 min read
|
Saved February 14, 2026
|
Copied!
Do you care about this?
The author reflects on the challenges of using AI for writing, noting that while AI produces impressive content, combining multiple versions often leads to a disjointed final product. He emphasizes the need to accept imperfections and move forward rather than chase an elusive ideal.
If you do, here's more
AI has transformed writing, producing coherent and engaging content that mimics a writer's voice. Marc Randolph highlights his experience with AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude, which generate distinct versions of a text. Each version offers unique strengths—grabbing hooks, clever analogies, and strong conclusions—but combining these elements often leads to a disjointed final product. Despite having the best parts from each version, the narrative flow suffers, resulting in a piece that feels inconsistent.
Randolph expresses frustration over the editing process, where he spends more time trying to merge AI-generated drafts than if he had written the content himself. The challenge lies not just in crafting a cohesive piece but also in the loss of brilliant lines and angles from discarded drafts. He compares this struggle to film editing, where excellent scenes must be cut for a coherent storyline. Ultimately, Randolph suggests that writers need to prioritize completion over perfection. Instead of endlessly refining content, they should select one satisfactory version and move on, acknowledging that no piece can achieve perfection.
Questions about this article
No questions yet.