Open Source projects face the inevitable reality that their leaders will eventually step down or be unable to continue. The author illustrates this with a historical analogy, comparing the transition of power in these projects to dynasties where succession often leads to chaos. Most Open Source projects begin with a single individual, often governed by a Benevolent Dictator For Life (BDFL) model. However, the author warns that this model can falter if the leader becomes tyrannical, as has happened recently with several BDFLs mismanaging their projects. The article praises the Mastodon project for its effective leadership transition. Eugen Rochko, the outgoing CEO, exemplifies transparency in his blog post about stepping down, acknowledging the pressures he faced and admitting his own limitations in the project's growth. This contrasts sharply with many BDFLs who cling to power and act out of self-interest. The author emphasizes the importance of having a succession plan, especially for projects that have grown significantly, urging leaders to think beyond their own tenure and consider the community's health. For smaller projects, a formal succession plan may not be necessary, but for those with thousands of users or significant influence, sharing responsibility is crucial. Project leaders need to adopt a mature approach to governance, prioritize community interests, and understand the principles of collaboration and consent. The author calls for a cultural shift among leaders, encouraging them to act responsibly and plan for a future where they are no longer in control, ultimately highlighting the lasting impact of their contributions.