9 min read
|
Saved February 14, 2026
|
Copied!
Do you care about this?
Erik Torenberg argues that venture capital is evolving. He emphasizes that successful VC firms must adapt to new realities, focusing on winning deals and providing substantial support to founders, rather than just investing capital. The article also contrasts the rise of large firms with niche players in the industry.
If you do, here's more
Erik Torenberg argues that the venture capital (VC) landscape has shifted significantly, moving away from the traditional view that larger firms are inherently disrespectful to the game. He cites the Greek myth of Icarus as a metaphor for ambition without respect, but emphasizes that the current VC environment requires different dynamics. The rise in software, an increase in founders creating larger companies, and longer private company lifespans mean that today's founders need more than capital—they need active partners who can provide real support.
Torenberg also addresses misconceptions about the size of the venture capital ecosystem. Detractors point to underperforming firms as evidence that the asset class should be smaller. He counters this, noting that a larger VC footprint has coincided with increased startup valuations and economic growth. The argument that VC should shrink overlooks the benefits of a thriving startup market. He highlights how winning deals has become vital; firms must compete not just for the right picks but also for the opportunity to invest in promising companies. As competition grows, the ability to secure deals can be more important than the skill of selecting the right companies.
He points out that the VC market is becoming more efficient due to repeat entrepreneurs and faster scaling companies. This efficiency means that while picking the right company remains important, the ability to win deals has taken precedence. Torenberg introduces the distinction between a "firm" and a "fund," where a firm focuses on both returns and building a competitive advantage. He draws parallels with Y Combinator, which he believes has created a moat with its structural advantages and network effects, allowing it to thrive despite growth. Ultimately, he suggests that understanding these dynamics is crucial for navigating the modern VC landscape.
Questions about this article
No questions yet.