6 min read
|
Saved February 12, 2026
|
Copied!
Do you care about this?
The article discusses the merging roles of infrastructure and observability teams as companies increasingly integrate observability into their offerings. It highlights key acquisitions and the growing importance of AI in incident response, while advocating for an open standard approach using OpenTelemetry and Apache Iceberg to manage data effectively.
If you do, here's more
In 2026, the lines between Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) and infrastructure teams are blurring as infrastructure companies enter the observability space. They’re not just offering better dashboards; they’re aiming for a comprehensive control over telemetry data, which allows them to package additional services. Recent acquisitions, like Palo Alto Networks buying Chronosphere and Snowflake acquiring Observe, highlight this shift. These moves indicate a strategic pivot from merely selling tools to engaging in a broader entry-point competition within the observability market.
Observability is expensive and complex, with real costs associated with incidents and slow recovery times. Many teams are frustrated with unpredictable pricing, and companies are actively seeking better cost management solutions. This frustration has led to job postings explicitly calling out the need for control over observability costs. However, the high costs alone don’t explain why platform companies are making major acquisitions in this area. The integration of AI plays a significant role; if AI can reduce mean time to recovery (MTTR) and automate some incident response tasks, teams see it as a worthwhile investment.
The article emphasizes the role of OpenTelemetry as a standard for observability. It decouples the instrumentation from the backend, easing transitions between systems. The author suggests that the future standard stack will combine OpenTelemetry with Apache Iceberg, which provides an open data layer, reducing vendor lock-in. This flexibility is crucial, especially in AI scenarios where multiple agents might need to run parallel queries. The potential for skyrocketing costs is a real concern when using vendor-specific systems, especially if agents generate inefficient or erroneous queries that could strain resources during critical incidents. Open table formats are becoming essential for managing these challenges effectively.
Questions about this article
Q: what are the observability products discussed here?
The article discusses several observability products and companies:
1. **[Chronosphere](https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/company/press/2025/palo-alto-networks-to-acquire-chronosphere--next-gen-observability-leader--for-the-ai-era)** - Recently acquired, indicating a shift towards full-stack observability solutions.
2. **[HyperDX](https://clickhouse.com/blog/clickhouse-acquires-hyperdx-the-future-of-open-source-observability)** - Another acquisition that highlights the merging of infrastructure and observability.
3. **[Observe](https://www.snowflake.com/en/news/press-releases/snowflake-announces-intent-to-acquire-observe-to-deliver-ai-powered-observability-at-enterprise-scale)** - Its acquisition points to the growing demand for AI-driven observability tools.
4. **[OpenTelemetry](https://opentelemetry.io/docs/)** - The standard for observability data collection, helping to reduce vendor lock-in.
5. **[Apache Iceberg](https://iceberg.apache.org/)** - Proposed as a key component for an open data layer, supporting better data management in observability.
6. **[RisingWave](https://risingwave.com/)** - A tool designed for local state and streaming aggregation, aimed at improving observability data pipelines.
These products illustrate the evolving nature of observability, particularly in the context of AI and data management.
February 13, 2026 at 02:09 AM