Trump Declares 'Artificial Intelligence' Users the Enemy, Pushes 'Super Intelligence' / X
Short summary
Trump issued an executive order requiring federal agencies to use "Super Intelligence" instead of "Artificial Intelligence" in official documents, and his administration is now characterizing people who use the term "AI" as enemies. The move has drawn criticism from those who see it as government overreach on language use.
- Trump's September 29 executive order mandates all federal agencies adopt "Super Intelligence" and "SI" terminology in official communications and documents.
- The White House framed the terminology shift as honoring the technology's potential and America's leadership, though the rationale for the specific rebranding remains unclear.
- Critics argue the mandate is un-American government control of speech, while others simply called it lame; the shift also aligns with Elon Musk's recent terminology changes.
Full summary
Trump issued a statement on October 8 declaring that people using the term "Artificial Intelligence" are enemies of the administration. This escalates his September 29 executive order requiring federal agencies to replace "AI" with "Super Intelligence" or "SI" in all official documents and communications. The White House framed the terminology shift as recognizing the technology's potential and America's competitive position in the field.
The move triggered mixed reactions on X. Some users, including those noting Elon Musk's own recent terminology switch, shared it as significant news. Others pushed back hard—calling the mandate lame and fundamentally un-American. One prominent response compared it to government mandates on pronoun usage, arguing the federal government shouldn't dictate how citizens speak. The backlash highlighted broader skepticism about renaming technology through executive fiat rather than organic adoption.
The related trending topics show this sits within Trump's larger AI messaging strategy. He's simultaneously pushed "Super Intelligence" branding while dismissing AI safety concerns as a hoax and emphasizing U.S. technological leadership. The terminology push appears designed to reframe AI discourse around American dominance rather than existential risk, though the framing as an enemy declaration—targeting people rather than ideas—created an immediate credibility problem.